Revert "Minor changes on .HLP files"

This reverts commit 028fdd80.

src/fr/ird/climprod/resources/help/ISOSTOCK.HLP

-Does the data applies to the full metapopulation or at least to one of its sub-stocks 
-with limited connectivity?
- 
-The degree of connectivity between sub-stocks of the metapopulation is to be assessed
-to answer this question. Connectivity patterns range from a well-mixed larval pool 
-(maximal connectivity) at one extreme to a collection of closed self-sustaining populations 
-(minimal connectivity) at the other. However, most situations are intermediate to these 
-two extremes (MSC, 2020).
+Is the sub-stock considered well isolated (with few exchanges) from 
+the others ? 
 
-Answer YES if the considered stock exploited by the fleet(s) is either: 
-1) a full metapopulation with reasonably high connectivity. Note that according to 
-your previous answers, all these eventual sub-stocks must be exploitedby the fleet(s) 
-corresponding to your data-set. This case is not in contradiction with the fact that 
-you answer YES to the question "Does the data-set apply to a unit stock"; 
-
-2) or if it is only one of its substocks with limited connectivity with 
-the rest of the metapopulation. 
-
-MSC (2020) MSC Guidance to the Fisheries Certification Process v2.2. MSC Document: 89 pp.
\ No newline at end of file
+Answer YES if the studied sub-stock has few exchanges with the other
+sub-stocks of the area, in terms of migration and recruitment.
\ No newline at end of file

src/fr/ird/climprod/resources/help/METAPOPULATION.HLP

-Does the data-set apply to metapopulation?
-
-The concept of metapopulation was first proposed by Levins (1968). 
-It was then enriched with new ideas and summarised by McQuinn (1997) and 
-can be defined as : ‘The population structure of many species can be 
-considered as an array of local populations linked by variable degrees 
-of gene flow’.
-
-According to Sale et al. (2006), in some cases, stocks may be structured 
-as “metapopulations” – systems in which local populations (namded sub-
-populations or sub-stocks, or components) inhabit discrete habitat patches 
-and inter-patch dispersal is neither so low as to negate significant demographic 
-connectivity, nor so high as to eliminate any independence of local population 
-dynamics.
-
-Levins R (ed.). 1968. Evolution in changing environments. Princeton,
-New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
-
-McQuinn IH. 1997. Metapopulations and the Atlantic herring. Reviews
-in Fish Biology and Fisheries 7: 297–329.
-
-Sale PF, Hanski I, Kritzer JP (2006). The merging of metapopulation theory and marine ecology: establishing the historical context. In: Kritzer JP, Sale PF (Eds) Marine Metapopulations. Chapter 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam: 3-28

src/fr/ird/climprod/resources/help/PESSIMIS.HLP

-Do you have any (additional) reason to expect a highly unpredictable behaviour or a collapse of the stock?
+Do you have any (additional) reason for suggesting a pessimistic modelization
+of production?
 
 Answer YES if you want to use a linear relationship between the CPUE and
 the fishing effort. This choice will force the software to choose a Schaefer

src/fr/ird/climprod/resources/help/PUEUNSTA.HLP

@@ -2,7 +2,5 @@ Strong instability in the CPUE time-series?
 
 Answer YES if the CPUE time-series presents large fluctuations in a short
 time (over 100%, not autocorrelated, providing an erratic aspect of the plot).
-This case is in favour of linear production models (please note that this 
-question is only partly duplicating a previous question regarding four time
-series: "Is interannual variability too strong?").
+This case is in favour of linear production models.
 
\ No newline at end of file

src/fr/ird/climprod/resources/help/SINGLEST.HLP

-Does the data-set apply to a unit stock?
+Does the data-set apply to a single stock?
  
-From the fisheries management point of view, a unit stock can be defined as 
-a group of fish that can be treated as a stock and managed as an independent unit, 
-as long as the results of the assessment and the impact of management measures 
-do not differ significantly from what they would be in the case of a truly 
-independent stock (Gulland, 1983, MSC, 2020).
-
-Answer YES if the stock is made of a single species and not subdivided into various 
-geographical sub-stocks independant from each other.
-
-Gulland, J.A. (1983). Fish stock assessment. A manual of basic methods. 
-Chichester, John Wiley and Sons, FAO/Wiley series on food and agriculture. 
-Vol. 1: 223 pp
-
-MSC (2020) MSC Guidance to the Fisheries Certification Process v2.2. MSC Document: 89 pp.
+Answer YES if the stock is not subdivided into various geographical 
+sub-stocks.

src/fr/ird/climprod/resources/help/VALIDE.HLP

-Is there a reasonable jackknife coefficient R2 (>65% recommended),
-no extreme yearly coefficients  an acceptable F test (p<0.01 recommended) and acceptable MSY graph?
+Reasonable jackknife coefficient R2 (over 65% recommended),
+no yearly extreme coefficient and acceptable MSY graph?
  
 As CPUE=Y/E the two variables CPUE and E are not mathematically independant.
 Therefore, the conventional parametric or non-parametric tests on R2 are